
Nigerian President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s rejection of the idea of centralizing gambling regulation has become a real breakthrough for the entire industry. Market players, investors, and experts call this decision a turning point that can change the rules of the game in the coming years. The intrigue lies in how the new conditions will open doors for fresh investments and allow companies to respond flexibly to the demands of local authorities.
The rejected bill proposed transferring control over lotteries, betting, and online gaming to the federal level. Its authors sought to create a single regulatory center that would manage all aspects of the country’s gambling market. However, at a meeting of the National Executive Committee of the party, President Tinubu decided not to sign this document.
He confirmed that the regulation of gambling remains under the jurisdiction of individual states, which fully complies with the recent 2024 Supreme Court ruling. This decision enshrined the right of regions to independently determine the rules, issue licenses, and control the activities of operators. As a result, the legal status of the market has become more defined, and companies have received clear guidelines for operations.
Many industry representatives consider the rejection of centralization a victory for business and market development. The iBet Africa platform called this event the starting point for a new stage, when each investor and operator will be able to build a strategy based on the specifics of a particular region.
Experts highlight several key advantages of the new model: legal certainty allows companies to plan long-term investments, operational stability reduces risks, and the diversity of regional approaches creates conditions for competition. The gambling market now resembles a mosaic picture, where each state becomes an independent element with unique rules and business opportunities.
Legal experts, even before the president’s decision, pointed out contradictions between the idea of federal centralization and the country’s constitution. The division of powers means a system in which different levels of government have their own areas of responsibility, and the regulatory framework determines who and how controls the industry. According to senior partners of law firms, the adoption of a central law would disrupt the balance between the federal center and the regions.
Civil organizations, such as the Coalition for Good Governance, vehemently stated the inadmissibility of such attempts, considering them a violation of judicial authority. There are examples in global practice where gambling regulation is also decentralized; for example, in the USA, each state determines its own rules for the gambling market, which allows local interests to be taken into account.
Companies operating in the gambling market now face a number of new obligations. They will have to interact directly with the regulators of each state, build local partnerships, and strictly comply with individual compliance standards. Compliance means fulfilling all legal requirements and internal rules to minimize legal and financial risks.
Operators must monitor changes in regulations in each region, which complicates doing business but at the same time opens opportunities for flexible adaptation. Among the potential difficulties is the need to take into account different standards of reporting, licensing, and control. The question arises whether companies will be able to effectively manage such diverse processes, or whether this system will create new barriers to growth.
Analysts predict that by 2026, states will begin to actively implement innovations in licensing, control, and the promotion of gambling. Proactive regions will gain a number of advantages: increased investment flow, development of local services, and increased market transparency.
This approach will allow a state to become attractive to international and local players who are looking for clear and stable conditions for operations. In the context of competition between regions, the importance of regulatory quality, speed of decision-making, and openness to new technologies increases. This creates prerequisites for the emergence of modern platforms, new types of games, and player support services.
In modern conditions, such a decision is especially relevant, since only in the last few years online casinos have introduced such new products as crash games and Plinko. They are quickly gaining popularity—this is confirmed by both analysts and data from review sites. We selected several resources from the top search results and decided to clarify the issue of the popularity of new products. The authors of the site with the list of available Plinko real money casinos provided a detailed response. They pointed out that the number of online casinos with Plinko is constantly growing. According to them, they have to create more and more reviews of new platforms with this game.
Also, Plinko is now quite popular among players in Nigeria. The situation with crash games is similar. This indicates that players in the country are open to new offerings.
As a result of the rejection of centralization, the gambling market in Nigeria has received a new impetus for development. Legal transparency has increased, investor interest is growing, and operators gain the freedom to implement their own strategies. Similar reforms have already led to market growth in other countries, such as the USA and Canada, where a decentralized approach made it possible to take into account the specifics of each region. Now Nigeria faces the question: will the new model make the country a leader in the African gambling business and create unique opportunities for players, companies, and society?