PDP Blows Hot As Supreme Court Sacks Ihedioha, Declares Uzodinma Winner

 

The Peoples Democratic Party has broken its silence after the Supreme Court on Tuesday nullified the election of Emeka Ihedioha as the Governor of Imo State.

 

A seven-man panel of the apex court led by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Tanko Muhammad, unanimously declared Hope Uzodinma of the All Progressives Congress as winner of the March 9, 2019 governorship election and the validly elected governor of the state.

 

According to Punch, there was a lull in the courtroom as the apex court handed down the judgment. Ihedioha’s lawyers and supporters were visibly shocked after the apex court delivered the judgment at 6:20pm during an eight-hour sitting with two intermittent breaks.

 

More than 10 minutes after the apex court panel members departed the courtroom, Ihedioha’s lawyers and supporters were unable to move as they remained stuck to the same position

 

But Uzodinma’s supporters in the courtroom burst into shouts of joy as they stepped out of the courtroom.

 

They joined others, who could not gain entry into the courtroom, to celebrate the court’s pronouncement. Some of them appeared to be making calls informing their supporters back home of their court victory.

 

Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, who read the lead judgment,  ordered that the certificate of return issued to Ihedioha be immediately withdrawn. She directed that a fresh certificate of return should be issued to Uzodinma.

 

She also directed that Uzodinma, who came distant fourth in the results of the election declared on March 11, 2019 be immediately sworn in as the Governor of Imo State.

 

Justice Kekere-Ekun dismissed the All Progressives Grand Alliance’s Ifeanyi Ararume’s appeal for being academic following the court’s declaration of Uzodinma as the winner of the election.

 

In upholding Uzodinma’s appeal on Tuesday, the Supreme Court agreed with him that the votes polled in 388 out of the 3,523 polling units were excluded in the final results declared by the Independent National Electoral Commission in the states, on March 11, 2019.

 

Justice Kekere-Ekun ruled that with the addition of the excluded votes to the earlier declared final results, Uzodinma polled the highest lawful votes with the required spread of votes in the state.

 

She set aside the judgments of both the Imo State Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal and the Court of Appeal which had both affirmed Ihedioha’s election.

 

She stated, “The lower court misunderstood the case of the appellants,” she ruled, adding that “the case was not a case of exclusion from the election but exclusion of votes from final results.”

 

She explained that the lower courts were wrong to have rejected the results of the 388 polling units on the grounds that they were not tendered before the tribunal by the proper person.

 

The results were said to have been tendered by the 54th petitioners’ witness.

“P54, a police officer who tendered the results was subpoenaed to produce the results. Having been subpoenaed to produce the results, it was wrong for the lower courts to hold that P54 was not the proper person to tender the results,” Justice Kekere-Ekun ruled.

 

Ihedioha had argued that the Supreme Court had earlier in its judgment delivered on December 20, 2019 declared that Uche Nwosu was the candidate of both the APC and the Action Alliance and on the basis of that declared the nomination of Nwosu for the March 2019 election as null and void.

 

His lawyers argued that the apex court’s judgment implied that Uzodinma was not the APC’s candidate in the election.

 

But addressing this argument in the Tuesday’s judgment, Justice Kekere-Ekun held that the issue of nomination was a pre-election issue that could not be raised in a post-election litigation.

 

As the consequence of the findings, she ordered, “The judgment of the lower court which declared  the first appellant as the winner with the majority of lawful votes is hereby set aside.

 

Reacting to the news, the PDP National Publicity Secretary, Mr Kola Ologbondiyan, in a statement, described the judgment as yet another very sad commentary on the nation’s democratic order.