Jimoh Ibrahim has been dealt a sad blow by a court over attempts to reclaim assets seized by AMCON.
Jimoh Ibrahim
Attempts by Nigerian businessman, Jimoh Ibrahim to recover properties worth millions of naira seized by the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria has failed.
This comes after the Federal High Court in Lagos, on Tuesday, declined an application by a businessman to reclaime the assets. His properties were seized over an alleged indebtedness of N69.4bn.
AMCON had on November 4, 2020, obtained an interim order to seize about 12 properties from Ibrahim and his firms, Nicon Investment Limited and Global Fleet Oil and Gas Limited, in a bid to recover an alleged N69.4bn debt.
But Ibrahim and the firms have gone back to court with an application seeking to set aside the seizure order and recover the properties.
Ibrahim and his firms contended that the court made the seizure order in error because AMCON allegedly concealed material facts in its ex parte application leading to the seizure order.
They urged the court to set aside the order for “non-disclosure and misrepresentation of material facts”.
Ruling on the application on Tuesday, Justice Rilwan Aikawa upheld AMCON’s argument that it made full and substantial disclosure of all material facts at the time of obtaining the orders on November 4, 2020.
He said, “I have carefully studied the respective applications and arguments for or against of parties. I agree totally with the counsel for the claimant Kemi Pinheiro (SAN) that this suit is sui generis as Section 49(1)(2) of the AMCON Act says that the order made on the 4th of November, 2020, can be made ex-parte on mere suspicion that the rest is about to be dissipated.
“In my opinion, we have a unique situation here. The application that led to the ex-parte order made on the 4th of November 2020 was brought pursuant to the provisions of AMCON Act which defines this as a Federal High Court.
“I do not think that based on the above reasons, that this application has made a case out for the order of this court to be vacated. The appropriate order to be made in this circumstance is to dismiss same and, accordingly, this application is hereby dismissed.”
Justice Aikawa adjourned till March 9 for further proceedings.