Get Latest Tori News Alert!
Enter your email below.

Delivered by FeedBurner

Hot Stories
Recent Stories

You’re Committing Judicial Sacrilege – HURIWA Warns Buhari Over Refusal To Release Nnamdi Kanu After Appeal Court Order

Posted by Thandiubani on Thu 20th Oct, 2022 -

The group further described the Federal government as promoting impunity, perfidy, and unconstitutionality.

President Muhammadu Buhari has been warned of the implications of refusing to release Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra even after Appeal Court in Abuja discharged and acquitted him.
Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria, HURIWA said the action of the Federal Government of Nigeria to appeal the judgement without first respecting the binding judgment of the Court of Appeal amounts to judicial sacrilege.
The group further described the Federal government as promoting impunity, perfidy, and unconstitutionality.
HURIWA said the disobedience by the Federal Government to the definitive verdict of the Appellate Court shows deep-seated hatred of the Igbo ethnic nationality.
The rights group said this is because the President is aware of the probable explosive security implication for Ndigbo of the continuous illegal detention of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu but did not budge but damned the consequences on purpose, hoping that civil unrest or riotous protests will break out in the South East so soldiers will be drafted to have an incredible excuse to kill off Igbo youths.
The Court of Appeal in Abuja, on Thursday last week, struck out the terrorism charges filed against Mr. Kanu by the government and ordered his release from the custody of the State Security Service (SSS).
It held that the IPOB leader was “extra-ordinarily renditioned” to Nigeria and that the action was a flagrant violation of the country’s extradition treaty and also a breach of Mr. Kanu’s fundamental human rights.
But the Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, in a late Thursday statement by his spokesperson, Umar Gwandu, argued the Court of Appeal only discharged Mr. Kanu and did not acquit him. He indicated that the government would not release Mr Kanu despite the court ruling.
HURIWA lamented that, however, the Federal government headed by President Buhari went to the Supreme Court of Nigeria seeking a stay of execution of the Appeal Court’s decision and further seeking the invalidation of the judgment.
But the group, in a statement by its national coordinator, Emmanuel Onwubiko, said President Buhari’s government is hypocritical because it was in flagrant breach of a binding Appeal Court’s judgment and had gone to equity with dirty hands by failing to comply with the judgment before appealing.
HURIWA said the same President Buhari had, through the justice ministry, argued in another matter at the National Industrial Court it filed and won against the Academic Staff Union of Universities but argued that ASUU couldn’t institute any application for a stay of execution or appeal the ruling unless it first of all respect the decision of the Court ordering the then striking Unionists to resume their duties.
The rights group, therefore, wondered how such a roguish administration with two morally self-contradictory standards over the same related issue of respecting judgment before an appeal is now before the supreme court to deny Mazi Nnamdi Kanu of his constitutionally guaranteed fundamental freedoms as reinstated by the Court of Appeal. HURIWA said by this act of infamy, the federal government has brought shame and opprobrium to the image of Nigeria Internationally and locally.


Top Stories
Popular Stories

Stories from this Category
Recent Stories